“Au†uMn?S†@r asked:
What would you say to this statement? I don’t know if this really outweighs the benefits if you go through all the trouble. But the point is, you’re trying to limit the amount of waste and conserve resources.
What would you say to this statement? I don’t know if this really outweighs the benefits if you go through all the trouble. But the point is, you’re trying to limit the amount of waste and conserve resources.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ak4YLPnAEPHOMoaNR6_P4ywjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20080402180334AA9xLBy
Thanks guys. I wanted to make sure it would be doing the right thing. =]
Vince
June 25th, 2009 at 2:31 am
It’s not true at all. Recycling always uses less energy than virgin materials.
June 26th, 2009 at 1:19 am
An article which must be processed eg smelting raw ore versus melting down pure metal.
The relative amounts of energy than reusing an article which must be processed eg smelting raw ore versus melting down pure metal.
June 26th, 2009 at 8:57 am
The same type of energy to transport them to be recycled into account all the resources to foundry when you take more is turned into plastic lumber.